MEP Christine Anderson RIPS EU’s pandemic policies, says they have “nothing to do with public health”

05/04/2022 / By Ramon Tomey

A member of the European Parliament denounced policies by governments in Europe to address the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) as having “nothing to do with public health.”

In her debut speech before the European Union’s COVID-19 inquiry committee, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Christine Anderson criticized the bloc’s COVID-19 policies. She also demanded an inquiry into the human rights violations committed on citizens under the guise of curbing the spread of the virus.

“[Governments’ COVID-19 policies] had nothing to do with public health. [It’s] a money-making exercise for the pharmaceutical industry. Why isn’t that being investigated?” said Anderson, who is part of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party.

She also zeroed in on the “false claims regarding the safety and so-called effectiveness of the [COVID-19] vaccines” alongside their “alleged definitive approval.” According to the German MEP, data from the European Medicines Agency showed the COVID-19 vaccines causing “20 times as many serious side effects and 23 times as many deaths” within a seven-month period – compared to all other vaccines in the past two decades combined.

The AfD lawmaker also pointed out the blatant refusal to investigate or even consider alternative methods to combat COVID-19. “[The EU’s policy] boiled down solely to ‘vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate,'” remarked Anderson.

She mentioned three issues for the committee’s scrutiny.

First, it must look into the “implementation of vaccine contracts.” There is only scant information available regarding the contracts between vaccine makers and different European nations due to the committee’s withholding of this necessary data.

Second, it must look into the “restriction of fundamental rights that are unworthy of a democracy.” Anderson continued: “From job losses, discrimination and marginalization – we have experienced a redefinition of fundamental rights.” Based on this new definition, rights turned into privileges that the government can simply pick who to grant and who to deprive of.

Third, it must also look into the “marginalization and criminalization of critics” expressing disagreement toward the “anti-democratic measures.”

Anderson also slams the WHO’s pandemic treaty

Prior to her speech, the German MEP condemned the pandemic treaty proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a direct attack on liberties and freedom. She likened the treaty to the “nine foxes and a rabbit democratically voting on what to have for dinner.”

“The plan, for anyone who can use [their] thinking skills, is easy to see through. A democratically non-legitimized body, into which the richest of the super-rich buy their way through donations, is to decide in the future whether a pandemic situation exists, in order to then directly take over governmental power,” said Anderson.

She added that once the WHO treaty comes into effect, it can restrict fundamental rights as it sees fit “almost like a world government” – bypassing the sovereignty of states and their elected leaders. (Related: WHO Pandemic Treaty: A power-grabbing act to control health responses of UN member countries.)

The WHO’s pandemic treaty also had its share of critics across the pond, with investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network among them. The two touched on the treaty on an episode of Bigtree’s program “The HighWire.”

“This WHO pandemic treaty is really important because it’s a one-stop-shop, it’s just like a lock and key. State sovereignty is over, country sovereignty is over. Top-down bio-surveillance, vaccine passports, turnkey everything for your country, essentially,” explained Jaxen. “They’re planning on signing this treaty in 2024.”

Bigtree agreed with Jaxen.

“Is there really an agenda going on? The WHO, obviously, is not an American organization. It really wants to be the World Health Order, [and] that is what it is turning into. It wants to dictate. It wants to supersede your president, your senators [and] your congresspeople. It wants to be the governing authority if there just happens to be another pandemic 365 days after the last one – which should be 100 times faster than any natural form of a pandemic before.”

MedicalTyranny.com has more stories about EU governments’ draconian responses to COVID-19.

Watch MEP Christine Anderson condemning vaccine mandates and vaccine passports below.

This video is from the Puretrauma357 channel on Brighteon.com.